Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 10:11
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How can Substack help creators with their overall business strategy?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
If there was only one man remaining on the Earth, would this be regarded as extinction?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Fixing the Phoenix Suns: Retooling the roster in 6 steps - Bright Side Of The Sun
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How good do you sing and how do you know this?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
2 new measles cases confirmed in Colorado - 9News
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Why is my ex trying to provoke an argument with me?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
The Webb telescope found something exceedingly rare around a dying star - Mashable
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Persona 4 Revival Officially Revealed At Xbox Games Showcase - GameSpot